Monitoring of Germany's mobility transition: data and methods
Motivated by the carbon pricing system launched in Germany in 2021, C03 develops new statistical methods to investigate the response of households’ mobility to changes in the relative costs of alternative transport modes. In the long run, practically relevant adaptive versions of the two-stage models and model fitting techniques will be developed to estimate fuel price elasticities.
Project Leaders
Prof. Dr. Dr. Matei Demetrescu
Department of Statistics - Chair of Econometrics and Statistics
TU Dortmund University
Prof. Dr. Manuel Frondel
Department of Environment and Resources
RWI Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
Prof. Ph.D. Colin Vance
Department of Environment and Resources
RWI Leibniz Institute for Economic Research
Summary
The transportation sector has long been a renegade in efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Even as total emissions in Europe have decreased over the past decades, those from transportation are on the rise. To buck this trend, Germany's energy transition will therefore require a fundamental change in the mobility behavior of private households. This project investigates how households' mobility responds to changes in the relative costs of alternative transport modes, most notably those caused by changes in energy prices and in the built environment. By estimating household-group-specific fuel price elasticities, we study the heterogeneous impact of higher fuel prices on mobility demand and vehicle ownership of households that differ with respect to (a) wealth, (b) whether they live in rural or urban areas, and (c) driving distance. Each of these dimensions will be studied using innovative statistical methods, including advancements in spatio-temporal models, quantile regression, and machine learning techniques to aid in causal identification and model selection. We will additionally develop new statistical methodologies to investigate the effect of highly volatile fuel prices on kilometers traveled - as was the case following Russia’s attack on the Ukraine - and, more generally, the effect of possible non-stationarity of the analyzed variables on the outcome of the analysis. In particular, we will address spatial dependencies, as well as non-stationarities of energy prices, which may affect valid statistical inference. To account for potential price frictions and selectivity biases, innovative two-stage models will be adapted that incorporate both the discrete decision pertaining to car ownership (or use) and the continuous decision of distance traveled. When estimating the effect of the built environment, multistage models may likewise be required owing to the endogeneity of residential choice: to the extent that people settle in neighborhoods based on their transportation preferences, estimates of the effect of variables such as public transit proximity or local retail density may be biased. In this context, we will employ specific model selection criteria to take account of multistage mobility decisions and heteroskedasticity.
Adeyemi, O. I. and L. C. Hunt (2014). Accounting for asymmetric price responses and underlying energy demand trends in OECD industrial energy demand. Energy Economics 45, 435–444. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.07.012.
Alberini, A., M. Horvath, and C. Vance (2022). Drive less, drive better, or both? Behavioral adjustments to fuel price changes in Germany. Resource and Energy Economics 68, 101292. doi: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101292.
Alm, J., E. Sennoga, and M. Skidmore (2009). Perfect competition, urbanization, and tax incidence in the retail gasoline market. Economic Inquiry 47, 118–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00164.x.
Andrews, I., J. H. Stock, and L. Sun (2019). Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice. Annual Review of Economics 11, 727–753. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080218-025643.
Athey, S., M. Bayati, N. Doudchenko, G. Imbens, et al. (2021). Matrix Completion Methods for Causal Panel Data Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116, 1716–1730. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2021.1891924.
Athey, S., J. Tibshirani, and S. Wager (2019). Generalized Random Forests. The Annals of Statistics 47, 1148–1178. doi: 10.1214/18-AOS1709.
Bachmeier, L. J. and J. M. Griffin (2003). New evidence on asymmetric gasoline price responses. Review of Economics and Statistics 85, 772–776. doi: 10.1162/003465303322369902.
Behl, P., G. Claeskens, and H. Dette (2014). Focused model selection in quantile regression. Statistica Sinica. doi: 10.5705/ss.2012.097.
Behl, P., H. Dette, M. Frondel, and C. Vance (2019). A focused information criterion for quantile regression: Evidence for the rebound effect. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 71, 223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2018.08.001.
Belloni, A., D. Chen, V. Chernozhukov, and C. Hansen (2012). Sparse Models and Methods for Optimal Instruments With an Application to Eminent Domain. Econometrica 80, 2369–2429. doi: 10.3982/ECTA9626.
Bento, A. M., M. L. Cropper, A. M. Mobarak, and K. Vinha (2005). The effects of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 87, 466–478. doi: 10.1162/0034653054638292.
Bergman, N., T. Schwanen, and B. K. Sovacool (2017). Imagined people, behaviour and future mobility: Insights from visions of electric vehicles and car clubs in the United Kingdom. Transport Policy 59, 165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.07.016.
Berry, S., J. Levinsohn, and A. Pakes (1995). Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63, 841–889. doi: 10.2307/2171802.
Binder, N., H. Dette, J. Franz, D. Zöller, et al. (2022a). Data Mining in Urology: Understanding Real-world Treatment Pathways for Lower Urinary Tract Systems via Exploration of Big Data. European urology focus. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.03.019.
Binder, N., T. A. Gerds, and P. K. Andersen (2014). Pseudo-observations for competing risks with covariate dependent censoring. Lifetime data analysis 20, 303–315. doi: 10.1007/s10985-013-9247-7.
Binder, N., A.-S. Herrnböck, and M. Schumacher (2017). Estimating hazard ratios in cohort data with missing disease information due to death. Biometrical Journal 59, 251–269. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201500167.
Binder, N., K. Möllenhoff, A. Sigle, and H. Dette (2022b). Similarity of competing risks models with constant intensities in an application to clinical healthcare pathways involving prostate cancer surgery. Statistics in Medicine 41, 3804–3819. doi: 10.1002/sim.9481.
Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgovitsky (2022). When is TSLS Actually LATE? doi: 10.3386/w29709.
Boarnet, M. G. and S. Sarmiento (1998). Can land-use policy really affect travel behaviour? A study of the link between non-work travel and land-use characteristics. Urban studies 35, 1155–1169. doi: 10.1080/0042098984538.
Breitung, J. and M. Demetrescu (2015). Instrumental variable and variable addition based inference in predictive regressions. Journal of Econometrics 187, 358–375. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.10.018.
Bretz, F., K. Möllenhoff, H. Dette, W. Liu, et al. (2018). Assessing the similarity of dose response and target doses in two non-overlapping subgroups. Statistics in Medicine 37, 722–738. doi: 10.1002/sim.7546.
Brons, M., P. Nijkamp, E. Pels, and P. Rietveld (2008). A meta-analysis of the price elasticity of gasoline demand. A SUR approach. Energy Economics 30, 2105–2122. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.08.004.
Chaisemartin, C. de and X. D’Haultfœuille (2022). Two-Way Fixed Effects and Differences-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: A Survey. doi: 10.3386/w29691.
Chi, J. (2022). Asymmetric gasoline price effects on public transit ridership: Evidence from US cities. Transportation Research Record 2676, 643–659. doi: 10.1177/03611981211069065.
Chouinard, H. and J. M. Perloff (2004). Incidence of federal and state gasoline taxes. Economics Letters 83, 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.10.004.
Chouinard, H. H. and J. M. Perloff (2007). Gasoline price differences: Taxes, pollution regulations, mergers, market power, and market conditions. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 7. doi: 10.2202/1935-1682.1599.
Cohn, J. B., Z. Liu, and M. I. Wardlaw (2022). Count (and count-like) data in finance. Journal of Financial Economics 146, 529–551. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.08.004.
Copernicus (2020). CORINE Land Cover — Copernicus Land Monitoring Service. url: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover.
Cramon-Taubadel, S. von and J.-P. Loy (1996). Price asymmetry in the international wheat market: Comment. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie 44, 311–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.1996.tb00153.x.
D’Haultfœuille, X., P. Givord, and X. Boutin (2014). The Environmental Effect of Green Taxation: The Case of the French Bonus/Malus. The Economics Journal 124, 444–480. doi: 10.1111/ecoj.12089.
Davis, L. W. and L. Kilian (2011). Estimating the effect of a gasoline tax on carbon emissions. Journal of Applied Econometrics 26, 1187–1214. doi: 10.1002/jae.1156.
Demetrescu, M., M. Frondel, L. Tomberg, and C. Vance (2023a). Fixed Effects, Lagged Dependent Variables, and Bracketing: A Cautionary Note. USAEE/IAEE Working Paper Series No. 23-595. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4522212.
Demetrescu, M. and C. Hanck (2012). A simple nonstationary-volatility robust panel unit root test. Economics Letters 117, 10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.067.
Demetrescu, M. and C. Hanck (2018). Multiple Testing for No Cointegration under Nonstationary Volatility. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 80, 485–513. doi: 10.1111/obes.12214.
Demetrescu, M., C. Hanck, and A. I. Tarcolea (2014). IV-BASED COINTEGRATION TESTING IN DEPENDENT PANELS WITH TIME-VARYING VARIANCE. Journal of Time Series Analysis 35, 393–406. doi: 10.1111/jtsa.12071.
Demetrescu, M. and U. Homm (2016). Directed Tests of No Cross-Sectional Correlation in Large- N Panel Data Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 31, 4–31. doi: 10.1002/jae.2496.
Demetrescu, M., M. Hosseinkouchack, and P. M. M. Rodrigues (2023b). Tests of No Cross-Sectional Error Dependence in Panel Quantile Regressions. Ruhr Economic Papers. doi: 10.4419/96973210.
Dette, H., K. Möllenhoff, S. Volgushev, and F. Bretz (2018). Equivalence of regression curves. Journal of the American Statistical Association 113, 711–729. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2017.1281813.
Dimitropoulos, A., W. Oueslati, and C. Sintek (2018). The rebound effect in road transport: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. Energy Economics 75, 163–179. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.021.
Ding, P. and F. Li (2019). A Bracketing Relationship between Difference-in-Differences and Lagged-Dependent-Variable Adjustment. Political Analysis 27, 605–615. doi: 10.1017/pan.2019.25.
Duranton, G. and M. A. Turner (2018). Urban form and driving: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Urban Economics 108, 170–191. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2018.10.003.
EEA (2019). Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2017 and inventory report 2019, European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. url: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/european-union-greenhouse-gas-inventory-2019.
Frondel, M., M. Horvath, C. Vance, and A. Kihm (2020). Increased Market Transparency in Germany’s Market: What about Rockets and Feathers? Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 54.2, 102–120.
Frondel, M., C. Marggraf, S. Sommer, and C. Vance (2021). Reducing vehicle cold start emissions through carbon pricing: Evidence from Germany. Environmental Research Letters 3. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abde06.
Frondel, M., J. Peters, and C. Vance (2008). Identifying the Rebound: Evidence from a German Household Panel. Energy Journal 29. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol29-No4-7.
Frondel, M., N. Ritter, and C. Vance (2012). Heterogeneity in the rebound effect: Further evidence for Germany. Energy Economics 34, 461–467. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.10.016.
Frondel, M., C. M. Schmidt, and C. Vance (2016). Asymmetry: Resurrecting the roots. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 60, 201–206. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2015.09.002.
Frondel, M. and C. Vance (2010). Fixed, random, or something in between? A variant of Hausman’s specification test for panel data estimators. Economics Letters 107, 327–329. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.02.007.
Frondel, M. and C. Vance (2011). Rarely enjoyed? A count data analysis of ridership in Germany’s public transport. Transport Policy 18, 425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.09.009.
Frondel, M. and C. Vance (2013). Re-Identifying the Rebound: What About Asymmetry? The Energy Journal 34, 43–54. doi: 10.5547/01956574.34.4.3.
Frondel, M. and C. Vance (2017). Cycling on the extensive and intensive margin: The role of paths and prices. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 104, 21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.06.018.
Frondel, M. and C. Vance (2018). Drivers’ response to fuel taxes and efficiency standards: evidence from Germany. Transportation 45, 989–1001. doi: 10.1007/s11116-017-9759-1.
Frondel, M., C. Vance, and A. Kihm (2015). Time Lags in the Pass-Through of Crude-Oil Prices – Big Data Evidence from the German Gasoline Market. doi: 10.4419/86788659.
Frondel, M. and C. J. Vance (2012). Interpreting the outcomes of two-part models. Applied Economics Letters 19, 987–992. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2011.610733.
Gately, D. (1992). Imperfect price-reversibility of US gasoline demand: Asymmetric responses to price increases and declines. The Energy Journal 13. doi: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol13-no4-10.
Gillingham, K. and A. Munk-Nielsen (2019). A tale of two tails: Commuting and the fuel price response in driving. Journal of Urban Economics 109, 27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2018.09.007.
Goetzke, F. and C. Vance (2021). An increasing gasoline price elasticity in the United States? Energy Economics 95. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104982.
Goodwin, P., J. Dargay, and M. Hanly (2004). Elasticities of Road Traffic and Fuel Consumption with Respect to Price and Income: A Review. Transport Reviews 24, 275–292. doi: 10.1080/0144164042000181725.
Graham, D. J. and S. Glaister (2004). Road Traffic Demand Elasticity Estimates: A Review. Transport Reviews 24, 261–274. doi: 10.1080/0144164032000101193.
Griffin, J. M. and C. T. Schulman (2005). Price asymmetry in energy demand models: A proxy for energy-saving technical change? The Energy Journal 26. doi: 10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol26-no2-1.
Hanck, C. and W. Krämer (2011). The exact bias of s^2 in linear panel regressions with spatial autocorrelation. Economics Letters 110, 67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.09.015.
Harding, M. and C. Lamarche (2014). Estimating and testing a quantile regression model with interactive effects. Journal of Econometrics 178, 101–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2013.08.010.
Harding, M., C. Lamarche, and M. H. Pesaran (2020). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel quantile regression models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 35, 294–314. doi: 10.1002/jae.2753.
He, P., Z. Zou, Y. Zhang, and G. Baiocchi (2020). Boosting the eco-friendly sharing economy: The effect of gasoline prices on bikeshare ridership in three US metropolises. Environmental Research Letters 15, 114021. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/abbb52.
Holmgren, J. (2020). The effect of public transport quality on car ownership — A source of wider benefits? Research in Transportation Economics 83, 100957. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100957.
Houck, J. P. (1977). An approach to specifying and estimating nonreversible functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59, 570–572. doi: 10.2307/1239663.
Hughes, J. E., C. R. Knittel, and D. Sperling (n.d.). Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand (). doi: 10.3386/w12530.
Hymel, K. M. and K. A. Small (2015). The rebound effect for automobile travel: Asymmetric response to price changes and novel features of the 2000s. Energy Economics 49, 93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.12.016.
Jung, H., G. J. Yu, and K.-M. Kwon (2016). Investigating the effect of gasoline prices on transit ridership and unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of Public Transportation 19, 56–74. doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.19.4.4.
Kayser, H. A. (2000). Gasoline demand and car choice: Estimating gasoline demand using household information. Energy economics 22, 331–348. doi: 10.1016/S0140-9883(99)00043-2.
Keane, M. and T. Neal (2021a). A Practical Guide to Weak Instruments. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-092123-111021.
Keane, M. P. and T. Neal (2021b). A New Perspective on Weak Instruments. UNSW Economics Working Paper. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3846841.
Keller, R. and C. Vance (2013). Landscape pattern and car use: Linking household data with satellite imagery. Journal of Transport Geography 33, 250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.07.006.
Kihm, A., N. Ritter, and C. Vance (2016). Is the German Retail Gasoline Market Competitive? A Spatial-Temporal Analysis Using Quantile Regression. Land Economics 92, 718–736. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No1-4.
Knittel, C. R. and S. Tanaka (2021). Fuel economy and the price of gasoline: Evidence from fueling-level micro data. Journal of Public Economics 202. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104496.
Kohl, T., A. Sigle, T. Kuru, J. Salem, et al. (2022). Comprehensive analysis of complications after transperineal prostate biopsy without antibiotic prophylaxis: Results of a multicenter trial with 30 days’ follow-up. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 25, 264–268. doi: 10.1038/s41391-021-00423-3.
Le Barbanchon, T., R. Rathelot, and A. Roulet (2021). Gender differences in job search: Trading off commute against wage. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 136, 381–426. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3467750.
Leard, B., J. Linn, and V. McConnell (2017). Fuel Prices, New Vehicle Fuel Economy, and Implications for Attribute-Based Standards. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4, 659–700. doi: 10.1086/691688.
LeSage, J. and R. K. Pace (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics.
LeSage, J. P., C. Vance, and Y.-Y. Chih (2017). A Bayesian heterogeneous coefficients spatial autoregressive panel data model of retail fuel duopoly pricing. Regional Science and Urban Economics 62, 46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.11.003.
Li, L., D. Kasraian, and A. Shalaby (2020). Empirical analysis of long-run elasticities and asymmetric effects of transit demand determinants. Transportation Research Record 2674, 274–284. doi: 10.1177/0361198120925465.
Li, S., J. Linn, and E. Muehlegger (2014). Gasoline taxes and consumer behavior. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 6, 302–342. doi: 10.1257/pol.6.4.302.
Marion, J. and E. Muehlegger (2011). Fuel tax incidence and supply conditions. Journal of public economics 95, 1202–1212. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.04.003.
Metz, D. (2008). The myth of travel time saving. Transport reviews 28, 321–336. doi: 10.1080/01441640701642348.
Mogstad, M., A. Torgovitsky, and C. R. Walters (2021). The Causal Interpretation of Two-Stage Least Squares with Multiple Instrumental Variables. American Economic Review 111, 3663–3698. doi: 10.1257/aer.20190221.
Möllenhoff, K., F. Bretz, and H. Dette (2020). Equivalence of regression curves sharing common parameters. Biometrics 76, 518–529. doi: 10.1111/biom.13149.
Möllenhoff, K., H. Dette, E. Kotzagiorgis, S. Volgushev, et al. (2018). Regulatory assessment of drug dissolution profiles comparability via maximum deviation. Statistics in medicine 37, 2968–2981. doi: 10.1002/sim.7689.
Möllenhoff, K., F. Loingeville, J. Bertrand, T. T. Nguyen, et al. (2022). Efficient model-based bioequivalence testing. Biostatistics 23, 314–327. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa026.
Pickup, L. (1984). Women’s gender-role and its influence on travel behaviour. Built Environment, 61–68. url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23286009.
Ritter, N., C. M. Schmidt, and C. Vance (2016). Short-run fuel price responses: At the pump and on the road. Energy Economics 58, 67–76. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.013.
Silva, J. M. C. S. and S. Tenreyro (2006). The Log of Gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics 88, 641–658. doi: 10.1162/rest.88.4.641.
Small, K. A. and K. Van Dender (2007). Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect. The Energy Journal 28, 25–51. doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol28-No1-2.
Stapleton, L., S. Sorrell, and T. Schwanen (2016). Estimating direct rebound effects for personal automotive travel in Great Britain. Energy Economics 54, 313–325. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.12.012.
Tweeten, L. G. and C. L. Quance (1969). Positivistic measures of aggregate supply elasticities: Some new approaches. The American Economic Review 59, 175–183. doi: 10.2307/1237584.
Vance, C. and R. Hedel (2007). The impact of urban form on automobile travel: Disentangling causation from correlation. Transportation 34, 575–588. doi: 10.1007/s11116-007-9128-6.
Vance, C. and R. Hedel (2008). On the link between urban form and automobile use: Evidence from German survey data. Land Economics 84, 51–65. doi: 10.3368/le.84.1.51.
Vance, C. and R. Iovanna (2007). Gender and the automobile: Analysis of nonwork service trips. Transportation Research Record 2013, 54–61. doi: 10.3141/2013-08.
Vance, C. and M. Preistrup (2011). She’s got a ticket to ride: Gender and public transit passes. Transportation 39, 1105–1119. doi: 10.1007/s11116-011-9381-6.
Wang, X., S. Gronstal, B. Lopez, H. Jung, et al. (2023). Evidence of non-tailpipe emission contributions to PM2.5 and PM10 near southern California highways. Environmental Pollution 317, 120691. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120691.
White, M. J. (1986). Sex differences in urban commuting patterns. The American economic review 76.2, 368–372. url: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:76:y:1986:i:2:p:368-72.
Wolffram, R. (1971). Positivistic measures of aggregate supply elasticities: Some new approaches — Some critical notes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 53, 356–359. doi: 10.2307/1237462.
Yaman, F. and K. Offiaeli (2022). Is the price elasticity of demand asymmetric? Evidence from public transport demand. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 203, 318–335. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2022.09.005.
Yatchew, A. and J. A. No (2001). Household Gasoline Demand in Canada. Econometrica 69, 1697–1709. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00264.